Does Selling Your House "As Is" Shield You from Post-Sale Disputes?

In the complex world of real estate transactions, selling a property “as is” can seem like a straightforward escape from the hassle of repairs and renovations. However, this approach raises critical questions regarding its effectiveness in preventing post-sale disputes. A case that recently unraveled sheds light on the murky waters of “as is” sales, exposing the challenges sellers and real estate agents might face.

The Dispute Unveiled

In a revealing turn of events, a seller found themselves entangled in a legal dispute with the buyer of their property. Despite the property being sold “as is,” the buyer’s attorney dispatched a letter demanding $102,000 plus legal expenses within five days, citing statutory fraud and violation of Texas law. The grievances listed on the demand letter were substantial:

  • The plumbing was Kitec and had to be replaced.
  • The seller claimed the roof was ew, but the buyer believes it to be at least 6 years old.
  • The septic system needed a new pump immediately after closing.
  • Seller claimed the HVAC had been replaced but   the buyer believed it had not, and had to replace it.
  • Seller claimed repairs were made by professionals. However, The buyer believes the repairs were made by the sellers. Buyer states he had to have professionals come in and fix the repairs. 
  • Failed to disclosure the existence of an easement in the backyard
  • Buyer stated the pool was not in good condition and was not maintained by the seller, which resulted in the buyer draining and getting it replastered.
  • Buyer claims all the repairs the sellers agreed to before closing were not done by professionals, but were done poorly by the sellers.

Notably, the co-seller of the property had passed away by April 2023, adding a layer of complexity to the dispute. The seller expressed frustration, pointing out the buyer’s unyielding nature throughout the transaction and maintaining that the accusations were unfounded.

The “As Is” Clause Explained

Selling a house “as is” theoretically means the buyer accepts the property in its current state, acknowledging that the seller will make no repairs or improvements before the sale. It places the onus on the buyer to conduct due diligence through inspections and appraisals.

But Is It an Ironclad Defense?

The assumption that an “as is” sale absolves sellers of all responsibility post-sale is a common misconception. Legal experts caution that this clause does not protect sellers from the obligation to disclose known defects or from allegations of misrepresentation or fraud. In the case discussed, the buyer’s allegations suggest that the crux of their argument lies not in the refusal to perform repairs but in possible misinformation regarding the state of the property.

Implications for Real Estate Agents

This case underscores the importance of transparency and diligence for real estate professionals. Agents must:

  • Ensure sellers understand their disclosure obligations, even in “as is” transactions.
  • Navigate the intricacies of real estate laws that vary by locality, aware that “as is” provisions might not shield sellers from legal action based on claims of deception.
  • Let sellers know that the only shield they have is Sellers Shield’s Home Sale Legal Protection. 

Navigating Turbulent Waters

The preamble to any defense in disputes similar to the outlined case involves comprehensive documentation — receipts, maintenance records, and honest representations. Yet, the unpredictable nature of these disputes necessitates professional legal counsel. It’s a good thing the sellers had purchased Sellers Shield’s Home Sale Legal Protection before closing. They opted into the 2-year plan after they completed their disclosure. 


The allure of selling a property “as is” to simplify the transaction can be tempting, but as illustrated, it is not a bulletproof strategy against post-sale disputes. The balance between the “as is” clause’s appeal and the imperative of full disclosure represents a tightrope walk for sellers and their agents. This case reminds stakeholders in the real estate market that transparency, diligence, and the guidance of experienced professionals stand as their best defense in navigating the complexities of “as is” sales.

Scott was sued for $200,000 two years after the sale of his home.

He never dreamed he would be served papers in his driveway.

real customer receiving lawsuit in drive way.


Contact Us

Thank you!

for submitting your email